Google search engine

Private legal practitioner Martin Kpebu has said that there is a constitutional crisis following the declaration of some seats vacant by the Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin.

He says he disagrees with the Speaker of Parliament who had indicated that there was no constitutional crisis.

“Obviously there is a crisis because currently Parliament has not been sitting since 22nd October, and they have not been conducting business. That is a constitutional crisis,” he said on the Key Points on TV3 on Saturday, November 9.

“The crisis is over, the reason it appears to be lingering is because Afenyo-Markin couldn’t marshal his numbers in the House on Thursday when they met,” he added.

The Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin had dismissed claims that there is currently a constitutional crisis in Ghana.

Addressing a press conference in Accra on Wednesday, November 6, he said “There is no constitutional crisis in this country. The parliament of Ghana is alive and working, let nobody mislead, misinform, or disinform you and the country.

He added, “Democracy is about the rule of law, let the law work.”

His comment was in reaction to a statement by the Chief Justice, Gertrude Torkornoo.

“We are in a constitutional crisis. We have a country where Parliament is not sitting. What’s going on?” she remarked.

On Wednesday, October 30, the Supreme Court dismissed the application by the Speaker of Parliament Alban Bagbin to set aside its earlier ruling that stayed the execution of the Speaker’s declaration of four seats vacant.

During court proceedings, the apex court said the speaker’s application had no merit.
“We have considered the application, and we have come to the conclusion that the grounds supporting the application have no merit,” the Chief Justice stated.

“As the court pleases,” Bagbin’s lawyer, Thadeus Sory reacted.

It would be recalled that following an ex parte motion filed by Alexander Afenyo-Markin over the declaration of vacant seats by Bagbin, the apex court ordered for a stay of execution of the declaration.

In response, Bagbin filed an application at the apex court through his lawyer, Thaddeus Sory. The Speaker contends that the Supreme Court misapplied the law by putting on hold the execution of his ruling because it was a non-judicial decision.

The Speaker in his relief prayed the court to strike out its stay of execution of his ruling on the declaration of the four seats vacant, among others.

The Speaker is further seeking an order from the court to set aside the writ filed by the Leader of the New Patriotic Party (NPP) caucus, Alexander Afenyo-Markin, which sought to prevent the Speaker from making any ruling on the four seats.

According to the Speaker, the Supreme Court had powers to put on hold rulings of courts and not those of non-judicial bodies such as Parliament.

“In terms of orders staying of execution of rulings, the Supreme Court’s powers, under the 1992 Constitution of the Republic of Ghana and statute, to stay execution of rulings are limited to rulings of itself and of courts lower in the judicial hierarchy but do not extend to a ruling of the Speaker of Parliament who is not part of the judicial hierarchy,” the motion stated.

“With regard to the first defendant’s rulings in Parliament, a separate arm of Government, there fore, such rulings are not rulings within the judicial hierarchy so as to be the subject matter of ‘an application for stay of execution’ and a judicial order staying their execution,” it added.