The Minority in Parliament has opposed some amendments to the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, saying the proposed changes suggest the earlier Bill passed for Akufo-Addo’s assent was not fit for purpose.
New amendments to clause nine of the new Bill exempts individuals who provide legal services for persons who identify as LGBTQ+.
It also proposes exemptions for journalists and media houses reporting on LGBT-related news or current affairs in the normal course of their work, as well as for professionals offering medical, surgical, psychological, or counselling services to such individuals.
Speaking in Parliament on Friday, May 29, 2026, Minority MPs for Bosome-Freho and Assin South, Nana Asafo-Adjei Ayeh and John Ntim Fordjour argued that the proposed changes suggest the version of the Bill submitted for assent by former President Akufo-Addo was not adequately fit for purpose.
“The new bill we wanted Akufo-Addo to pass is now exempting all these people under this clause including NGOs, academic publications for science and medical opinions, the report of news and current affairs by the media house. The point we are making here is that this is watering down the point that you wanted Akufo-Addo to sign for which people have reasons. Today, it is clear that you are exempting all these people under this bill which is not the same bill you asked Akufo-Addo to sign,” Nana Asafo-Adjei Ayeh noted.
“These are the people sponsoring, supporting, pro- making sponsoring, making these activities rather attractive behind the scenes and even sometimes overtly. And so if I find it highly problematic, any attempt by this house to push any of these exceptions in, we will resist it. And if the house will use their majority numbers to push it through, I, as a sponsor, will advise myself accordingly,” John Ntim Fordjour added.
Meanwhile, Majority Leader, Mahama Ayariga, explained that the proposed amendments are intended to narrowly define exemptions in the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill, 2025, to ensure that professional services and routine activities are not interpreted as promoting LGBT activities.
