Andy Kwame Appiah-Kubi, the former lead counsel for embattled Ashanti Regional Chairman of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Bernard Antwi Boasiako, a.k.a. Wontumi, has said he does not see any political leanings in the jailing of his former client.
According to Appiah-Kubi, the records presented by the prosecution before the court had nothing politically-induced for him to accept the trial was politically engineered because of Wontumi’s affiliation.
His comments come after NPP leadership claimed Wontumi is a political prisoner. The party’s General Secretary, Justin Kodua Frimpong, said the trial was politically motivated and labelled Wontumi a political prisoner after his conviction.
READ ALSO: ‘Chairman Wontumi is a political prisoner’ – NPP’s General Secretary
But, speaking on the KeyPoints show on TV3 on Saturday, July 25, 2026, Mr. Appiah-Kubi indicated that there was nothing political with the ruling. He, however, stressed that the judgement does not support the evidence provided in determining the case.
“I agree that the evidence on record cannot support the verdict,” he noted adding that “I didn’t see any politics in the records,” when asked by host, Alfred Ocansey, if he agrees with the assertion that Wontumi is a political prisoner.
The former Asante Akyem North lawmaker insisted the judgement and evidence were inconsistent, expressing optimism that they can overturn the ruling in their pending appeal.
“…but what I’m saying is that, the judgement cannot be supported by the evidence. In any case, that is how I will interpret the situation. I will be firm in my conviction that the evidence here on this record cannot support the conviction,” he insisted.
Wontumi was found guilty, got convicted and sentenced by the High Court on Monday, July 20, 2026, in a trial in which he and his company, Akonta Mining Limited, were found guilty on six counts relating to the assignment of mineral rights without ministerial approval and facilitating an unlicensed mining operation.
That was after the court, presided over by Justice Audrey Kocuvie-Tay, held that the prosecution had proved its case that Chairman Wontumi and Akonta Mining permitted Henry Okoom and Michael Gyedu Ayisi to undertake mining activities on the company’s concession without securing the prior approval of the Minister for Lands and Natural Resources, and thereby facilitated illegal mining on the land.
In addition to the jail term, Chairman Wontumi will pay GH¢120,000, in default of which he will serve three years in prison.
His company, however, will pay GH¢180,000 on two counts.
Relying largely on circumstantial evidence, the court was of the view that the absence of ministerial approval was never contested by the defence, describing the admission as implicit since no application for approval had been been made by the company.
Chairman Wontumi had told the court he had granted Henry Okoom permission only to reclaim land by planting coconut, and not to mine.
He said he did not know Okoom was a small-scale miner, maintaining that Okoom had presented himself as a mine support service provider.
The court, however, held that this explanation could not stand.
It added that Chairman Wontumi led no evidence to verify Okoom’s claimed reclamation experience, and that Okoom, in unchallenged testimony, told the court he mined on unmined portions of the concession to recover costs after Chairman Wontumi failed to give him money for the reclamation work.
Relying on the principles of circumstantial evidence set out in Duah v The Republic [1987-88] 1 GLR 343, the court found that no reasonable explanation existed to rival the conclusion that Chairman Wontumi had knowingly permitted Okoom to mine.
It dismissed as an afterthought Chairman Wontumi’s later explanation that he expected Okoom to recover his costs from the eventual sale of matured coconuts.
Citing the exceptions in the seminal case of Morkor v Kuma, the court lifted Akonta Mining’s corporate veil, finding no functioning management or executive board within the company.
It held that Chairman Wontumi was the true de facto holder of the mineral right and the sole controlling mind of the company during the period the offences were committed.
“The A3’s corporate veil should be lifted as there is no real difference between the two (Chairman Wontumi and Akonta) in relation to dealing with the persons permitted to mine.
“There was no functioning management board and executive management board to deal as a company. All acts were done by Chairman Wontumi, the true de facto holder of the mineral right,” the judge said.
Several lawyers took turns to pray for mitigation and urged the court to impose the minimum sentence.
Meanwhile, the leadership of the NPP has announced its intentions to appeal the ruling, describing their Chairman’s sentencing as politically motivated.
